Wednesday, September 23, 2015

DIFFERENT SOCIETIES FOR HAIR TRANSPLANT SURGEONS.

www.drvaibhavshah.net
Vaibhav Shah
Dr Vaibhav Shah 


DIFFERENT  SOCIETIES FOR HAIR TRANSPLANT SURGEONS

American Society of Hair Restoration Surgery
Australasian Hair and Wool Research Society
Australasian Society of Hair Restoration Surgery
Brazilian Society of Hair Restoration Surgery
British Association of Hair Restoration Surgeons
Canadian Association of Hair Restoration Surgery
European Society of Hair Restoration Surgery
French Hair Restoration Surgery Society
German Society of Hair Restoration (Verband Deutscher Haarchirurgen)
International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery
Italian Society for Hair Restoration
Indian Association of Hair Restoration Surgeons
Japan Society of Clinical Hair Restoration
Polish Society of Hair Restoration Surgery
Spanish Surgeons Society of Hair Restoration (SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA DE CIRUJANOS DE TRASPLANTE DE PELO - S.E.C.T.P.)
International Society of Hair Restoration Surgeons
www.ishrs.org
 ISHR (Italia Society for Hair Restoration)
http://www.ishr.it/engsite/edefault.htm
 Dr. Vaibhav Shah.
www.vaibhavshahblog.blogspot.com
--

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

A comparison between strip harvesting and FUE hair transplants.

www.drvaibhavshah.net
Vaibhav Shah
+Dr Vaibhav Shah



A comparison between strip harvesting and FUE hair transplants.
            We continue our comparison of the hair restoration surgical procedures of Strip Harvesting versus FUE.In strip harvesting, doctors take strips of hair-bearing tissue from part of the head and place them elsewhere, while with FUE - follicular unit extraction, doctors take follicular units of one to four hairs instead of entire strips, and transplant them elsewhere on the head. In this second article of the three-part series we will talk about graft survival, graft placement and graft numbers. 
            Graft Survival.Debate exists over the rate of survival using FUE versus strip grafts. There is some concern that since FUE grafts may have very little tissue surrounding them, they are less likely to survive. Such grafts are more prone to dehydration, which has been shown to be a major cause of diminished graft survival. The lack of tissue surrounding the hair follicle is often a result of “pulling” on the graft to remove it. Because there is added manipulation in trying to remove a graft this may also contribute to diminished survival. With FUE hair transplants there is a greater chance of damaging hairs as compared to strip harvesting, and this could result in poor growth or lack of growth depending on the level of damage. The rates of damage seem to vary widely with FUE. Conversely, with strip harvesting, grafts may be damaged in making the initial skin incisions and subsequent dissection of the tissue, but this is considered minimal. The use of the microscope for dissection of the donor strip should limit damage rates to 1-2%. Grafts created with strip harvesting generally have a greater amount of surrounding tissue and fat. This may decrease the chance of dehydration and allow for greater leeway in manipulation of the grafts during placing and hence, better graft survival.
             Placing of Grafts.
           When manual placement of grafts is used there is no difference between the two techniques. There may be some concern about the fragility of FUE grafts and the fact that they may be more susceptible to drying. Perfectly harvested grafts may be damaged during the placement phase and fail to grow. Trauma and graft drying are well known factors that may occur in inexperienced hands and will impact graft survival. Regardless of how grafts are harvested, there is a considerable amount of artistry and technical expertise necessary to place them to produce an excellent or even acceptable result. The surgeon must be able to create an aesthetic "blueprint" for graft placement, determining the distribution of 1, 2, and 3 hair grafts. Hairline design is obviously important, as is the grafting plan over the rest of the scalp. 
            Number of grafts per session   
            In general most physicians who perform FUE hair transplants cannot do as many grafts in a single session they can with strip harvesting. With strip harvesting, sessions of 2000-3000 grafts are very common and some physicians frequently perform sessions in excess of 4000 grafts. There are, however, exceptions and some physicians, routinely performing FUE, report similar in excess of 2000 grafts.
Dr.Vaibhav Shah
www.vaibhavshahblog.blogspot.com

---

Sunday, September 6, 2015

A Facelift, technically known as a Rhytidectomy – History.

www.drvaibhavshah.net
Vaibhav Shah
 +Dr Vaibhav Shah 
                                      A Facelift, technically known as a Rhytidectomy – History.

  A facelift, technically known as a rhytidectomy (from Ancient Greek ῥυτίς (rhytis) "wrinkle" + ἐκτομή (ektome) "excision", surgical removal of wrinkles), is a type of cosmetic surgery procedure used to give a more youthful facial appearance. There are multiple surgical techniques. It usually involves the removal of excess facial skin, with or without the tightening of underlying tissues, and the redraping of the skin on the patient's face and neck. Facelifts are effectively combined with eyelid surgery (blepharoplasty) and other facial procedures and are typically performed under general anesthesia or deep twilight sleep.

History

Cutaneous period (1900–1970)
In the first 70 years of the 20th century facelifts were performed by pulling on the skin on the face and cutting the loose parts off. The first facelift was reportedly performed by Eugen Höllander in 1901 in Berlin. An elderly female polish aristocrat asked him to: "lift her cheeks and corners of the mouth". After much debate he finally proceeded to excise an elliptical piece of skin around the ears. The first textbook about facial cosmetic surgery (1907) was written by Charles Miller (Chicago) entitled "The Correction of Featural Imperfections".
In the First World War (1914–1918) the Dutch surgeon Johannes Esser made one of the most famous discoveries in the field of plastic surgery to date, namely the "skin graft inlay technique," the technique was soon used on both English and German sides in the war. At the same time the British plastic surgeon Harold Delfs Gillies used the Esser-graft to school all those who flocked towards him who wanted to study under him. That’s how he earned the name "Father of 20th Century Plastic Surgery". In 1919 Dr. Passot was known to publish one of the first papers on face-lifting, this consisted mainly on the elevating and redraping of the facial skin. After this many others began to write papers on face-lifting in the 1920s. From then the esthetic surgery was being performed on a large scale, from the basis of the reconstructive surgery. The first female plastic surgeon, Suzanne Noël, played a large role in its development and she wrote one of the first books about esthetic surgery named: "Chirurgie Esthetique, son rôle social."

SMAS period (1970–1980)
In 1968 Tord Skoog introduced the concept of subfacial dissection, therefore providing suspension of the stronger deeper layer rather than relying on skin tension to achieve his facelift (he publishes his technique in 1974, with subfacial dissection of the platysma without detaching the skin in a posterior direction). In 1976 Mitz and Peyronie described the anatomical Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System, or SMAS,a term coined by Paul Tessier, Mitz and Peyronie’s tutor in craniofacial surgery, after he had become familiar with Skoog’s technique. After Skoog died of an heart attack, the superficial muscular aponeurotic system (SMAS) concept rapidly emerged to become the standard face-lifting technique, which was the first innovative change in facelift surgery in over 50 years.
Deep plane period (1980–1991)
Tessier, who had his background in the craniofacial surgery, made the step to a subperiosteal dissection via a coronal incision. In 1979, Tessier demonstrated that the subperiosteal undermining of the superior and lateral orbital rims allowed the elevation of the soft tissue and eyebrows with better results than the classic face-lifting. The objective was to elevate the soft tissue over the underlying skeleton to re-establish the patient's youthful appearance.

Volumetric period (1991–today)
At the start of this period in the history of the facelift there was a change in conceptual thinking, surgeons started to care more about minimizing scars, restoring the subcutaneous volume that was lost during the ageing process and they started making use of a cranial direction of the "lift" instead of posterior.
                       The technique for performing a facelift went from simply pulling on the skin and sewing it back to aggressive SMAS and deep plane surgeries to a more refined facelift where variable options are considered to have an aesthetically good and a more long-lasting effect.-
Dr. Vaibhav Shah

www.vaibhavshahblog.blogspot.com.